The Mazda CX-3 is fun to drive, gentle and arguably a best looking automobile in a class. But we substantially shouldn’t buy one, as a Mazda 3 hatchback offers some-more value for your income with identical practicality.
There’s a lot to like about a Mazda CX-3.
The flowing, curvy side form helps confuse from a naturally-odd proportions of such a short, front-wheel expostulate vehicle. The windshield is easily pulled back, saving a CX-3 from a stubby-hood syndrome that permeates a segment.
The cabin is also well-designed, with red and white leather blending with a a Alcantara chair inserts. There are a few bizarre sum — a miss of balance of a vents bugs me — though Mazda has mostly stranded with a customary interior pattern design that some-more than lives adult to a $29,615 as-tested price.
More importantly, Mazda kept a heading pushing dynamics. It’s not utterly as good to expostulate as a company’s sedan offerings, though a CX-3 matches a CX-5 for easy doing in a crossover package.
Be wakeful that it functions some-more as a movement automobile than a loyal sports offering. Power from a 2.0-liter engine is a medium 146 horsepower, so it’s best to reason onto speed by corners rather than have to pattern it adult again on a straights.
In some-more loose driving, a CX-3 is pretty gentle and well-damped. Competitors like a Toyota CH-R are somewhat softer, though a CX-3 is a distant cry from unpleasant.
It’s noisier than we competence design given that a Mazda approaches $30,000. That’s my biggest problem with a CX-3.
While a Grand Touring indication came with all we would feasible wish in a tiny crossover — involuntary high beams, a heads-up display, blind-spot monitoring and some-more — there’s no ignoring that this is still a mainstream subcompact crossover.
The Mazda 3 we recently tested, with a bigger engine though a primer transmission, costs usually $26,685. For that, we get identical apparatus though improved styling, even some-more considerable dynamics and identical interior room. You also get dual apart engine options and a choice of a smashing primer transmission.
The CX-3 had some-more teenager annoyances than a company’s normal hatchback. The core hovel was a pivotal irritation, as a armrest was placed as if it was privately designed to get in a approach of a infotainment controls and crater holders.
Finally, a usually important advantage a CX-3 has over a Mazda 3 is a all-wheel drive, though I’ve prolonged argued that many buyers will never need all-wheel drive. $3,000 buys we an awful lot in sleet tires and ascent fees, so a value tender clearly tips towards a 3.
If we positively contingency have a subcompact crossover, a Mazda CX-3 is an glorious choice. The automobile is good to expostulate and we favourite it. we usually like a Mazda 3 improved and we consider we will, too.
Driving Experience: 4
Price as configured: $29,615