Midsize SUV Comparison
In a sections that follow we’ll consider how these 3 competing vehicles perform in 4 critical categories.
Styling, Design, and Layout
An wholly biased matter, good pattern is about change and proportion, purify lines, and apt detailing. In this respect, Chevrolet’s Traverse gets a family-sized crossover SUV visible recipe accurately right. The Atlas isn’t distant off, a some-more imperishable demeanour including oversized buffer flares that undersize a SUV’s customary 18-in. wheels. Subaru trails with additional visible weight over a front wheels and farfetched sculpturing.
When it comes to a interior, Subaru’s multiple of upscale impression and improved peculiarity materials helps to make adult for mislaid pattern ground. The Ascent looks and feels like value, since a Chevy and Volkswagen both humour from glossy, inexpensive-looking plastics that are formidable to accept during their cost points. Furthermore, Subaru offers a some-more appealing brew of colors, trims, chair upholstery, and seating configurations.
Chevrolet and Volkswagen both get tip outlines for their control layouts. The Traverse offers morality and discerning operation, while a Atlas has a Germanic, no-nonsense, though high-tech arrangement that includes a widescreen digital orchestration display. By comparison, a Ascent’s control blueprint is bustling and looks partially dated.
In terms of extraneous styling, interior design, and control layout, a 3 SUVs acquire a following scores:
- Chevrolet Traverse = 9.5/10
- Volkswagen Atlas = 9/10
- Subaru Ascent = 8.4/10
Comfort and Cargo
The whole indicate of shopping a 3-row SUV is to lift some-more than 4 or 5 people and/or copiousness of cargo. In this respect, a Volkswagen Atlas is a best choice of this trio.
All 3 of these SUVs have gentle front seats, and with a affordable Premium trim level, Subaru earns a eminence of charity cloth stain-resistant upholstery in multiple with both chair heating and many of a appealing options accessible for a Ascent.
However, usually a Volkswagen offers a choice of a second-row dais chair in multiple with a tip trim turn and all of a trimmings, creation it able of carrying 5 adults and 55.5 cu. ft. of load during a same time (captain’s chairs are discretionary for many Atlas trims). Subaru puts second-row captain’s chairs into a Ascent Touring (optional for mid-grade trims), and many Chevy Traverse trim levels embody customary captain’s chairs with no second-row dais chair option.
Furthermore, a Atlas’s third-row chair is habitable by adults since it sits high off a SUV’s building and provides good leg support total with decent legroom. The Traverse’s third-row chair is not as comfortable, and a smaller Ascent has comparably close buliding in a rearmost seating area.
By central measurements, a Chevy has a many load space, trimming from 23 cu. ft. behind a third-row chair to 57.8 behind a second-row captain’s chairs. The limit series is 98.2 cu. ft.
However, a VW isn’t distant behind (20.6 cu. ft./55.5 cu. ft./96.8 cu. ft.). Subaru lags behind these twin competitors with 17.6, 47, and 86 cu. ft., respectively.
In terms of chair comfort and load space, a 3 SUVs acquire a following scores:
- Volkswagen Atlas = 9/10
- Chevrolet Traverse = 8.7/10
- Subaru Ascent = 8/10
Safety and Technology
Subaru believes in a democratization of safety, and from a basement on a automaker’s latest automobile design to a customary EyeSight apartment of driver-assistance and collision-avoidance systems, a Ascent reflects a company’s loyalty to a health and contentment of a customers. Plus, we can obtain scarcely all of Subaru’s accessible reserve and infotainment technologies and services during a cost of reduction than $40,000.
For 2019, Volkswagen effectively matches a Subaru in terms of reserve record availability. Since blind-spot monitoring with back cross-traffic warning is now standard, some competence contend VW’s proceed with a Atlas is indeed some-more appealing. The Atlas, however, doesn’t acquire as stellar a crash-test news label from a Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), and a giveaway hearing offer for safety-related subscription services is shorter than Subaru’s.
Chevrolet includes twin considerable reserve facilities in any 2019 Traverse: Teen Driver monitoring record and a Rear Seat Reminder system. Unfortunately, Chevrolet pot many critical driver-assistance and collision-avoidance technologies usually for aloft trim levels, and provides no some-more than a 1-month hearing duration for OnStar services. Thereafter, subscription rates are also aloft than what Subaru and VW charge.
Chevy’s accessible 10-speaker Bose reward sound complement doesn’t sound as good as a 12-speaker Fender audio in a VW Atlas or Subaru’s absolute 14-speaker Harman Kardon components in a Ascent. Plus, Subaru offers an Entertainment Anywhere package with twin iPads and wireless headphones that, in multiple with a 4G LTE W-Fi hotspot and USB ports in all 3 rows, reflects a party mandate of complicated families.
Finally, a Subaru reserve some-more useful conveniences, from a wiper de-icer and steering-responsive headlights to a PIN-code entrance complement that allows we to leave a pivotal fob in a automobile while you’re running, hiking, or biking. Chevy has a Rear Camera Mirror video feed, that is a bit of a gimmick, while VW offers programmed steering support while parking, that is useful usually in situations when you’re not pity a highway or parking lot with any other motorists.
In terms of infotainment and reserve technologies, a 3 SUVs acquire a following scores:
- Subaru Ascent = 9/10
- Volkswagen Atlas = 8.5/10
- Chevrolet Traverse = 7.5/10
When it comes to pushing dynamics, any of these family-sized crossover SUVs has a graphic personality. The one that’s many suitable for we depends on how we expostulate and where we wish to go.
The Chevy Traverse delivers a best on-pavement pushing experience, that is good since that’s where many people spend many of their time. Its absolute and refined, 310-horsepower V-6 engine provides gratifying acceleration and returned a best fuel economy in a test, during 17.6 mpg*. The 9-speed involuntary delivery behaved well, and engineers have tuned a Traverse for an glorious mix of float and handling. The diseased mark was a brakes, that faded to a poignant grade during downhill towering pushing with twin adults aboard.
If we wish a some-more enchanting pushing experience, demeanour no serve than a Volkswagen Atlas. Naturally, it has a connected European feel to it, and on feeble confirmed cement too most impact rudeness creates a approach into a cabin. The 276-horsepower 3.6-liter V-6 is conjunction as powerful, refined, nor fit as a Chevy’s engine, and it returned no some-more than 17.3 mpg* during testing. But, a steering, brakes, ride, and a doing are all some-more enchanting than a Traverse’s, and with 8 ins. of belligerent clearance, it can fire by a decent volume of snow, or sincerely distant down a trail.
Subaru’s turbocharged Ascent valid absolute though thirsty, a 260-horsepower 2.5-liter 4-cylinder creation lots of torque though removing only 16.6 mpg* in sell for regulating it. The invariably non-static delivery (CVT) does a good pursuit of masking this form of transmission’s normal droning character, though can’t totally exterminate it. Handling is reduction secure than a Traverse and Atlas, and a float is a bit bouncy. The brakes, however, simply withstood abuse in nearby triple-digit temperatures. Plus, with 8.7 ins. of belligerent clearway and Subaru’s X-Mode traction technology, a Ascent can go places a Chevy and VW can’t.
In terms of pushing dynamics and fuel efficiency, a 3 SUVs acquire a following scores:
- Chevrolet Traverse = 8.7/10
- Volkswagen Atlas = 8.3/10
- Subaru Ascent = 7.8/10
*Each automobile was tested in prohibited continue conditions, with their meridian systems entirely engaged. Each automobile also idled for adult to half an hour during analysis periods. In daily driving, we are expected to see improved formula than we did.